The revolution will not be tactile

Alex said something brilliant (as he sometimes does) the other day. He was answering a question from an architecht on the Imagination Challenge. Roughly, the answer went:

With each major shift in society there is something different in centre of the wheel that is driving the change. This time it’s digital and it’s social.

No, you architects and industrial designers, this revolution isn’t about you. “You’ve had had your turn..” Now let us enjoy ours.

When we talk about design these days, think information design, think social, community, interaction and organizational design – don’t think industrial design, don’t think architecture.. That’s not what’s interesting in design right now. This design revolution is not tactile.

At least not (quite) yet

Posted in Archive, dead media | Leave a comment

Stream of (un)conciousness, it’s been a busy week.

# (community is much more than blogging*, but ahem) Forrester just released two fat ROI papers on corporate blogging. For real ROI, save yourself $600 and read Jevon’s version here.

# Have you noticed? Week by week more people are taking “us” seriously in this tech community of ours (un-community, camp people, “bloggers”, “we should be talking to the bloggers”, “will those bloggers talk about us?”. The mainstream has noticed, may even suddenly be taking us more seriously that even we do ourselves. Scary though? But then things in this community really are afoot (from DemoCamps to(o) ManyCamps, to the TTC, TTW, ICT Toronto, OpenCities, Wireless cities, innovation playgrounds and many I’m no doubt forgetting).

# Somewhat related, David Crow comments further here Community-driven leadership. I can’t say I know yet where he’s heading with that (reads a bit like writing your next job description Dave?) but what the hell, sign me up. That’s one fearless un-leader I would sponsor.

* someone (was it Anthony?) said roughly this last night: if the virtual interactions never lead to offline interactions, what’s even the point?

It’s not the social media, it’s what you can do with it silly.

just wait til you see what’s happening next week…

Posted in Archive, Uncategorized | Leave a comment

Made the papers again, Globe and Mail on ‘Freemium’ web services

The good news is that freemium services could introduce a lot of companies to technologies they might never have purchased five years ago. They are also being used by people who aren’t necessarily in a traditional IT role, because they were developed with the needs of line-of-business personnel — the managers, the admin staff and even the CEO — in mind.

“In some ways, the approval cycle has gotten a lot easier,” Mr. Purves says.

“Instead of it being something where I want to buy a piece of enterprise software and have to engage the tech people, where there’s a window of installation some time next September, now people can access these programs through a Web browser.”

Insightful article by Shane Schick from the globe and mail today on web services and the “Freemium” model. I had a chance to chat with Shane earlier this week about some of the challenges and opportunities of selling Web services and the “freemium” model [the modern equivalent of shareware, where you offer a free version and try to make your money by holding back features to the pro version].

We talked about some of the challenges of the Freemium model in terms of getting users to pay, but at the same time how in the business world, the model is working as Web services can deliver a lot of value to companies relative to traditional installed IT – and your typical business manager has a higher discretionary spending threshold than, say, the average myspace teenager. Freshbooks for instance is a great example of a Canadian Web2.0 company that has successfully take a big bite out of a small business market traditionally dominated by the likes of Intuit and other desktop applications.

I would add to the conversation is that freemium is not the only model going. Charging for it directly, is just one way to monetize a Web service. because of the service/community rather than from it. Advertising is one example, or building your app “as a feature rather than a service” that can sometimes create much greater value (much greater than you could have earned on your own) once plugged into a larger existing brand community or infrastructure. YouTube is of course the spectacular example of this as an acquisition play, or closer to home, bubbleshare and no doubt Nuuvo will follow as well.

Full article: ‘Freemium’ services: A Web surfer’s paradise

Posted in Archive, Uncategorized | Leave a comment