<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Alternative energy thought of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-15047</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-15047</guid>
		<description>I wanted to be part of the Windshare (&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.windshare.ca&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://www.windshare.ca&lt;/a&gt;) co-op when it launched many years ago but now that I&#039;m reminded of it, I wonder what held it up from being popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to be part of the Windshare (<a href="http://www.windshare.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.windshare.ca</a>) co-op when it launched many years ago but now that I&#39;m reminded of it, I wonder what held it up from being popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pearl</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-14946</link>
		<dc:creator>Pearl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 03:55:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-14946</guid>
		<description>I wanted to be part of the Windshare (http://www.windshare.ca) co-op when it launched many years ago but now that I&#039;m reminded of it, I wonder what held it up from being popular.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to be part of the Windshare (<a href="http://www.windshare.ca" rel="nofollow">http://www.windshare.ca</a>) co-op when it launched many years ago but now that I&#8217;m reminded of it, I wonder what held it up from being popular.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-14942</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:52:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-14942</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s best to take advantage of the home owners&#039; tax credit (before it expires). I used it to justify installing about 5K in efficient window upgrades to my craftsman style 975 sq ft one-level. Of that investment, I should get the full (1200 or 1400?) tax credit.

The fact that I have a fireplace and am not connected to the gas meter has had me thinking that I should look into other energy-efficiency upgrades to optimize electrical usage and possibly supplement heat with a pellet-type fireplace insert. If such a tax rebate or incentive program were in place for several years, or there were a P 2 P fund set up whereby I could borrow to complete the install and pay back over time using the energy/electrical savings, I&#039;d definitely be on-board.

Who knows, If I saved enough over time, I could possibly add an auto-switching battery inverter with wind or solar to supplement or replace my electrical usage altogether.

Low hanging fruit means different things to many people. In my case it&#039;s from a homeowners&#039; point of view who doesn&#039;t want any additional maintenance or ongoing capital outlay while still optimizing any efficiency gains. IE do the simple stuff first, less environmental impact is an added bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s best to take advantage of the home owners&#8217; tax credit (before it expires). I used it to justify installing about 5K in efficient window upgrades to my craftsman style 975 sq ft one-level. Of that investment, I should get the full (1200 or 1400?) tax credit.</p>
<p>The fact that I have a fireplace and am not connected to the gas meter has had me thinking that I should look into other energy-efficiency upgrades to optimize electrical usage and possibly supplement heat with a pellet-type fireplace insert. If such a tax rebate or incentive program were in place for several years, or there were a P 2 P fund set up whereby I could borrow to complete the install and pay back over time using the energy/electrical savings, I&#8217;d definitely be on-board.</p>
<p>Who knows, If I saved enough over time, I could possibly add an auto-switching battery inverter with wind or solar to supplement or replace my electrical usage altogether.</p>
<p>Low hanging fruit means different things to many people. In my case it&#8217;s from a homeowners&#8217; point of view who doesn&#8217;t want any additional maintenance or ongoing capital outlay while still optimizing any efficiency gains. IE do the simple stuff first, less environmental impact is an added bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-44350</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-44350</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s best to take advantage of the home owners&#039; tax credit (before it expires). I used it to justify installing about 5K in efficient window upgrades to my craftsman style 975 sq ft one-level. Of that investment, I should get the full (1200 or 1400?) tax credit.

The fact that I have a fireplace and am not connected to the gas meter has had me thinking that I should look into other energy-efficiency upgrades to optimize electrical usage and possibly supplement heat with a pellet-type fireplace insert. If such a tax rebate or incentive program were in place for several years, or there were a P 2 P fund set up whereby I could borrow to complete the install and pay back over time using the energy/electrical savings, I&#039;d definitely be on-board.

Who knows, If I saved enough over time, I could possibly add an auto-switching battery inverter with wind or solar to supplement or replace my electrical usage altogether.

Low hanging fruit means different things to many people. In my case it&#039;s from a homeowners&#039; point of view who doesn&#039;t want any additional maintenance or ongoing capital outlay while still optimizing any efficiency gains. IE do the simple stuff first, less environmental impact is an added bonus.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s best to take advantage of the home owners&#8217; tax credit (before it expires). I used it to justify installing about 5K in efficient window upgrades to my craftsman style 975 sq ft one-level. Of that investment, I should get the full (1200 or 1400?) tax credit.</p>
<p>The fact that I have a fireplace and am not connected to the gas meter has had me thinking that I should look into other energy-efficiency upgrades to optimize electrical usage and possibly supplement heat with a pellet-type fireplace insert. If such a tax rebate or incentive program were in place for several years, or there were a P 2 P fund set up whereby I could borrow to complete the install and pay back over time using the energy/electrical savings, I&#8217;d definitely be on-board.</p>
<p>Who knows, If I saved enough over time, I could possibly add an auto-switching battery inverter with wind or solar to supplement or replace my electrical usage altogether.</p>
<p>Low hanging fruit means different things to many people. In my case it&#8217;s from a homeowners&#8217; point of view who doesn&#8217;t want any additional maintenance or ongoing capital outlay while still optimizing any efficiency gains. IE do the simple stuff first, less environmental impact is an added bonus.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dinnen</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-14368</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dinnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:39:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-14368</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me. I don&#039;t know enough about finance to really assess the idea, but I like it. Couple of thoughts though:

You might install local solar rather than investing in a distant project because the former would presumably increase the value of your home. Plus off-gridness, that distant energy project isn&#039;t going to keep your lights on in a power cut.

Also, seems like the feeling green person and the saving on energy bill person might look at the problem differently. e.g. If you care about the environmental impact of your home&#039;s energy use, rather just what the energy costs, then doing some additional, not so low hanging, energy-efficiency improvements might make sense. Because making energy-efficiency improvements cuts the environmental impacts of the home for its lifetime, not just the period you own it. Which you might care about from a green point of view, but not so much from a pure financial PoV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me. I don&#8217;t know enough about finance to really assess the idea, but I like it. Couple of thoughts though:</p>
<p>You might install local solar rather than investing in a distant project because the former would presumably increase the value of your home. Plus off-gridness, that distant energy project isn&#8217;t going to keep your lights on in a power cut.</p>
<p>Also, seems like the feeling green person and the saving on energy bill person might look at the problem differently. e.g. If you care about the environmental impact of your home&#8217;s energy use, rather just what the energy costs, then doing some additional, not so low hanging, energy-efficiency improvements might make sense. Because making energy-efficiency improvements cuts the environmental impacts of the home for its lifetime, not just the period you own it. Which you might care about from a green point of view, but not so much from a pure financial PoV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick Dinnen</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2010/01/19/alternative-energy-thought-of-the-day/comment-page-1/#comment-44349</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick Dinnen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 17:39:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=811#comment-44349</guid>
		<description>Makes sense to me. I don&#039;t know enough about finance to really assess the idea, but I like it. Couple of thoughts though:

You might install local solar rather than investing in a distant project because the former would presumably increase the value of your home. Plus off-gridness, that distant energy project isn&#039;t going to keep your lights on in a power cut.

Also, seems like the feeling green person and the saving on energy bill person might look at the problem differently. e.g. If you care about the environmental impact of your home&#039;s energy use, rather just what the energy costs, then doing some additional, not so low hanging, energy-efficiency improvements might make sense. Because making energy-efficiency improvements cuts the environmental impacts of the home for its lifetime, not just the period you own it. Which you might care about from a green point of view, but not so much from a pure financial PoV.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Makes sense to me. I don&#8217;t know enough about finance to really assess the idea, but I like it. Couple of thoughts though:</p>
<p>You might install local solar rather than investing in a distant project because the former would presumably increase the value of your home. Plus off-gridness, that distant energy project isn&#8217;t going to keep your lights on in a power cut.</p>
<p>Also, seems like the feeling green person and the saving on energy bill person might look at the problem differently. e.g. If you care about the environmental impact of your home&#8217;s energy use, rather just what the energy costs, then doing some additional, not so low hanging, energy-efficiency improvements might make sense. Because making energy-efficiency improvements cuts the environmental impacts of the home for its lifetime, not just the period you own it. Which you might care about from a green point of view, but not so much from a pure financial PoV.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

