<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook vs Twitter as latest refuge of the nerds</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 18:44:44 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Micallef</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-15037</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Micallef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:28:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/#comment-15037</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a minor-major irritation of mine when a &quot;nerd&quot; (sic) says something is &quot;over&quot; or the honeymoon has faded or etc. It&#039;s the tech equivalent of Ben Mulroney on E-talk daily gushing about who or what is hot and what is not. Because it&#039;s tech doesn&#039;t make it any less annoying to be told by people who&#039;ve got their mouse on the pulse of web culture (or whatever) that something is over. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;People with FB pages that look like crap because they&#039;ve added too many application or have trouble managing too many friends only have themselves to blame. Facebook works, and works brilliantly, if you apply some common, real-life sense to your participation. As Dan mentions above, ignore and delete all the ridiculous applications. Like in music, art, etc, you&#039;ve got to wade through, or avoid, lots of crap to find the real gems (gems that would not have happened had FB not opened things up). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;With FB friends I&#039;ve got a rule that I need to have met/interacted with the person two separate times before I approve, so my network has some base in reality (virtual meetings count, I know some people quite well but have not met in the flesh). It limits the one-off meetings where you&#039;re stuck with somebody you&#039;ll never interact with again (some exception apply sure). I&#039;ve got a few dozen people who have requested friendship that I haven&#039;t replied to or approved because I either have never met them or i met them once or I knew them in highschool 15 years ago. That doesn&#039;t make me popular (though maybe an asshole), but you&#039;ve got to be a little rigorous to make it work. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If facebook doesn&#039;t work for nerds, that&#039;s fine, it works for everybody else. And I second Dan&#039;s &quot;elitist nerd&quot; comment above. No different than an insufferable indie rock fan who moves on to the newest ironic crap-in-a-cardigan band before anybody else does, and tells you all about it. It&#039;s all Ben Mulroney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a minor-major irritation of mine when a &#8220;nerd&#8221; (sic) says something is &#8220;over&#8221; or the honeymoon has faded or etc. It&#39;s the tech equivalent of Ben Mulroney on E-talk daily gushing about who or what is hot and what is not. Because it&#39;s tech doesn&#39;t make it any less annoying to be told by people who&#39;ve got their mouse on the pulse of web culture (or whatever) that something is over. </p>
<p>People with FB pages that look like crap because they&#39;ve added too many application or have trouble managing too many friends only have themselves to blame. Facebook works, and works brilliantly, if you apply some common, real-life sense to your participation. As Dan mentions above, ignore and delete all the ridiculous applications. Like in music, art, etc, you&#39;ve got to wade through, or avoid, lots of crap to find the real gems (gems that would not have happened had FB not opened things up). </p>
<p>With FB friends I&#39;ve got a rule that I need to have met/interacted with the person two separate times before I approve, so my network has some base in reality (virtual meetings count, I know some people quite well but have not met in the flesh). It limits the one-off meetings where you&#39;re stuck with somebody you&#39;ll never interact with again (some exception apply sure). I&#39;ve got a few dozen people who have requested friendship that I haven&#39;t replied to or approved because I either have never met them or i met them once or I knew them in highschool 15 years ago. That doesn&#39;t make me popular (though maybe an asshole), but you&#39;ve got to be a little rigorous to make it work. </p>
<p>If facebook doesn&#39;t work for nerds, that&#39;s fine, it works for everybody else. And I second Dan&#39;s &#8220;elitist nerd&#8221; comment above. No different than an insufferable indie rock fan who moves on to the newest ironic crap-in-a-cardigan band before anybody else does, and tells you all about it. It&#39;s all Ben Mulroney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Micallef</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-12251</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Micallef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 19:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/#comment-12251</guid>
		<description>In re-reading this I didn&#039;t mean to sound angry -- I wasn&#039;t. Still believe what I said, but nope it wasn&#039;t angry sounding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In re-reading this I didn&#8217;t mean to sound angry &#8212; I wasn&#8217;t. Still believe what I said, but nope it wasn&#8217;t angry sounding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Micallef</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-12238</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Micallef</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Feb 2008 19:41:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/#comment-12238</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a minor-major irritation of mine when a &quot;nerd&quot; (sic) says something is &quot;over&quot; or the honeymoon has faded or etc. It&#039;s the tech equivalent of Ben Mulroney on E-talk daily gushing about who or what is hot and what is not. Because it&#039;s tech doesn&#039;t make it any less annoying to be told by people who&#039;ve got their mouse on the pulse of web culture (or whatever) that something is over. 

People with FB pages that look like crap because they&#039;ve added too many application or have trouble managing too many friends only have themselves to blame. Facebook works, and works brilliantly, if you apply some common, real-life sense to your participation. As Dan mentions above, ignore and delete all the ridiculous applications. Like in music, art, etc, you&#039;ve got to wade through, or avoid, lots of crap to find the real gems (gems that would not have happened had FB not opened things up). 

With FB friends I&#039;ve got a rule that I need to have met/interacted with the person two separate times before I approve, so my network has some base in reality (virtual meetings count, I know some people quite well but have not met in the flesh). It limits the one-off meetings where you&#039;re stuck with somebody you&#039;ll never interact with again (some exception apply sure). I&#039;ve got a few dozen people who have requested friendship that I haven&#039;t replied to or approved because I either have never met them or i met them once or I knew them in highschool 15 years ago. That doesn&#039;t make me popular (though maybe an asshole), but you&#039;ve got to be a little rigorous to make it work. 

If facebook doesn&#039;t work for nerds, that&#039;s fine, it works for everybody else. And I second Dan&#039;s &quot;elitist nerd&quot; comment above. No different than an insufferable indie rock fan who moves on to the newest ironic crap-in-a-cardigan band before anybody else does, and tells you all about it. It&#039;s all Ben Mulroney.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a minor-major irritation of mine when a &#8220;nerd&#8221; (sic) says something is &#8220;over&#8221; or the honeymoon has faded or etc. It&#8217;s the tech equivalent of Ben Mulroney on E-talk daily gushing about who or what is hot and what is not. Because it&#8217;s tech doesn&#8217;t make it any less annoying to be told by people who&#8217;ve got their mouse on the pulse of web culture (or whatever) that something is over. </p>
<p>People with FB pages that look like crap because they&#8217;ve added too many application or have trouble managing too many friends only have themselves to blame. Facebook works, and works brilliantly, if you apply some common, real-life sense to your participation. As Dan mentions above, ignore and delete all the ridiculous applications. Like in music, art, etc, you&#8217;ve got to wade through, or avoid, lots of crap to find the real gems (gems that would not have happened had FB not opened things up). </p>
<p>With FB friends I&#8217;ve got a rule that I need to have met/interacted with the person two separate times before I approve, so my network has some base in reality (virtual meetings count, I know some people quite well but have not met in the flesh). It limits the one-off meetings where you&#8217;re stuck with somebody you&#8217;ll never interact with again (some exception apply sure). I&#8217;ve got a few dozen people who have requested friendship that I haven&#8217;t replied to or approved because I either have never met them or i met them once or I knew them in highschool 15 years ago. That doesn&#8217;t make me popular (though maybe an asshole), but you&#8217;ve got to be a little rigorous to make it work. </p>
<p>If facebook doesn&#8217;t work for nerds, that&#8217;s fine, it works for everybody else. And I second Dan&#8217;s &#8220;elitist nerd&#8221; comment above. No different than an insufferable indie rock fan who moves on to the newest ironic crap-in-a-cardigan band before anybody else does, and tells you all about it. It&#8217;s all Ben Mulroney.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan Dickinson</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-12236</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan Dickinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 16:45:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/#comment-12236</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve found that never adding (or responding to) any stupid applications helps. No, I don&#039;t want a superwall. No, I don&#039;t want to be bitten by your vampire. No, I don&#039;t want to beat you (and I WOULD beat you) at movie trivia.

I&#039;m also merciless when it comes to rejecting people I don&#039;t really know, so my Facebook experience has been reasonly clean. Hey, not terribly useful but with minimal annoyance is about all I can ask from a friend anyway...

I just think the elitist nerds want a new club that doesn&#039;t allow the unwashed masses.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve found that never adding (or responding to) any stupid applications helps. No, I don&#8217;t want a superwall. No, I don&#8217;t want to be bitten by your vampire. No, I don&#8217;t want to beat you (and I WOULD beat you) at movie trivia.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m also merciless when it comes to rejecting people I don&#8217;t really know, so my Facebook experience has been reasonly clean. Hey, not terribly useful but with minimal annoyance is about all I can ask from a friend anyway&#8230;</p>
<p>I just think the elitist nerds want a new club that doesn&#8217;t allow the unwashed masses.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernardo</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/comment-page-1/#comment-12234</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernardo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2008 03:52:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2008/02/12/facebook-vs-twitter-as-latest-refuge-of-the-nerds/#comment-12234</guid>
		<description>&quot;My facebook page looks as though seized by a grand mal craptileptic fit in spam factory.&quot;

Heehee! Seems that we all have that impression. But as you said, it also seems that Facebook &quot;is working hard to put the wrong bits of toothpaste back in the tube&quot;. Let&#039;s wait for the big revamp.
Best regards.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;My facebook page looks as though seized by a grand mal craptileptic fit in spam factory.&#8221;</p>
<p>Heehee! Seems that we all have that impression. But as you said, it also seems that Facebook &#8220;is working hard to put the wrong bits of toothpaste back in the tube&#8221;. Let&#8217;s wait for the big revamp.<br />
Best regards.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
