<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: 2.0 Tools You can Use: Impressed by Wufoo</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Purves</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Purves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>Bunny: integrating is a cinch, just drag and drop, nothing to it.

Mark: Management control is the big issue... the challenge I&#039;ve witnessed is that managers don&#039;t have control _now_ with the legacy process. Because forms and processes need to be managed by a central group and _not_ the business unit or the actual operations group involved, changes become hard to make, get made using bad assuptions - or just don&#039;t happen. 

What you see is a lot of forms/process badly out of sync with the actual facts on the ground - and operations staff resorting to some undocumented/ad-hock/unmanaged kludges when the legacy screens or forms don&#039;t allow them to do what actually needs to get done.

So if you talk to ops staff in deep bowels of the back office, they&#039;ll tell you things like &quot;oh we just ignore that whole section of the form because that hasn&#039;t applied to the product since 2003&quot; and instead we put the real instructions in the memo field and use these checkboxes to mean something else except on wednesdays, and &#039;Betty&#039; in the other dept knows what to do with it. (and everything &quot;works&quot; so long as Betty who gets paid $15/hr doesn&#039;t quit or get hit by a bus tomorrow  etc.) . - scary stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bunny: integrating is a cinch, just drag and drop, nothing to it.</p>
<p>Mark: Management control is the big issue&#8230; the challenge I&#8217;ve witnessed is that managers don&#8217;t have control _now_ with the legacy process. Because forms and processes need to be managed by a central group and _not_ the business unit or the actual operations group involved, changes become hard to make, get made using bad assuptions &#8211; or just don&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>What you see is a lot of forms/process badly out of sync with the actual facts on the ground &#8211; and operations staff resorting to some undocumented/ad-hock/unmanaged kludges when the legacy screens or forms don&#8217;t allow them to do what actually needs to get done.</p>
<p>So if you talk to ops staff in deep bowels of the back office, they&#8217;ll tell you things like &#8220;oh we just ignore that whole section of the form because that hasn&#8217;t applied to the product since 2003&#8243; and instead we put the real instructions in the memo field and use these checkboxes to mean something else except on wednesdays, and &#8216;Betty&#8217; in the other dept knows what to do with it. (and everything &#8220;works&#8221; so long as Betty who gets paid $15/hr doesn&#8217;t quit or get hit by a bus tomorrow  etc.) . &#8211; scary stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Purves</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-44146</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Purves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 14:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-44146</guid>
		<description>Bunny: integrating is a cinch, just drag and drop, nothing to it.

Mark: Management control is the big issue... the challenge I&#039;ve witnessed is that managers don&#039;t have control _now_ with the legacy process. Because forms and processes need to be managed by a central group and _not_ the business unit or the actual operations group involved, changes become hard to make, get made using bad assuptions - or just don&#039;t happen. 

What you see is a lot of forms/process badly out of sync with the actual facts on the ground - and operations staff resorting to some undocumented/ad-hock/unmanaged kludges when the legacy screens or forms don&#039;t allow them to do what actually needs to get done.

So if you talk to ops staff in deep bowels of the back office, they&#039;ll tell you things like &quot;oh we just ignore that whole section of the form because that hasn&#039;t applied to the product since 2003&quot; and instead we put the real instructions in the memo field and use these checkboxes to mean something else except on wednesdays, and &#039;Betty&#039; in the other dept knows what to do with it. (and everything &quot;works&quot; so long as Betty who gets paid $15/hr doesn&#039;t quit or get hit by a bus tomorrow  etc.) . - scary stuff</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bunny: integrating is a cinch, just drag and drop, nothing to it.</p>
<p>Mark: Management control is the big issue&#8230; the challenge I&#8217;ve witnessed is that managers don&#8217;t have control _now_ with the legacy process. Because forms and processes need to be managed by a central group and _not_ the business unit or the actual operations group involved, changes become hard to make, get made using bad assuptions &#8211; or just don&#8217;t happen. </p>
<p>What you see is a lot of forms/process badly out of sync with the actual facts on the ground &#8211; and operations staff resorting to some undocumented/ad-hock/unmanaged kludges when the legacy screens or forms don&#8217;t allow them to do what actually needs to get done.</p>
<p>So if you talk to ops staff in deep bowels of the back office, they&#8217;ll tell you things like &#8220;oh we just ignore that whole section of the form because that hasn&#8217;t applied to the product since 2003&#8243; and instead we put the real instructions in the memo field and use these checkboxes to mean something else except on wednesdays, and &#8216;Betty&#8217; in the other dept knows what to do with it. (and everything &#8220;works&#8221; so long as Betty who gets paid $15/hr doesn&#8217;t quit or get hit by a bus tomorrow  etc.) . &#8211; scary stuff</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McAlister</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-11283</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McAlister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 13:19:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-11283</guid>
		<description>Sounds good...I&#039;ll check it out.

Ref big banks:  You ask a good question about legacy software...it&#039;s like the Sorcerer&#039;s Apprentice - he can&#039;t figure out how to turn it off.... On the other hand, how can you have management control if everybody is creating their own forms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good&#8230;I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
<p>Ref big banks:  You ask a good question about legacy software&#8230;it&#8217;s like the Sorcerer&#8217;s Apprentice &#8211; he can&#8217;t figure out how to turn it off&#8230;. On the other hand, how can you have management control if everybody is creating their own forms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark McAlister</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-44145</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark McAlister</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 13:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-44145</guid>
		<description>Sounds good...I&#039;ll check it out.

Ref big banks:  You ask a good question about legacy software...it&#039;s like the Sorcerer&#039;s Apprentice - he can&#039;t figure out how to turn it off.... On the other hand, how can you have management control if everybody is creating their own forms?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds good&#8230;I&#8217;ll check it out.</p>
<p>Ref big banks:  You ask a good question about legacy software&#8230;it&#8217;s like the Sorcerer&#8217;s Apprentice &#8211; he can&#8217;t figure out how to turn it off&#8230;. On the other hand, how can you have management control if everybody is creating their own forms?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunnyhero</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-11281</link>
		<dc:creator>bunnyhero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:21:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-11281</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d taken a peek at wufoo before but had never actually tried using it for something real. it looks like integrating it into drupal wasn&#039;t a problem, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d taken a peek at wufoo before but had never actually tried using it for something real. it looks like integrating it into drupal wasn&#8217;t a problem, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bunnyhero</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-44144</link>
		<dc:creator>bunnyhero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 04:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-44144</guid>
		<description>i&#039;d taken a peek at wufoo before but had never actually tried using it for something real. it looks like integrating it into drupal wasn&#039;t a problem, then?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;d taken a peek at wufoo before but had never actually tried using it for something real. it looks like integrating it into drupal wasn&#8217;t a problem, then?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-11280</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-11280</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great writeup, and I&#039;m glad you&#039;re enjoying Wufoo. I just wanted to let you know that your form that is embedded sees to cut off the submit button a little short. To fix that, just increase the height of the iframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great writeup, and I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re enjoying Wufoo. I just wanted to let you know that your form that is embedded sees to cut off the submit button a little short. To fix that, just increase the height of the iframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Campbell</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/comment-page-1/#comment-44143</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Campbell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 May 2007 03:05:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/05/02/20-tools-you-can-use-impressed-by-wufoo/#comment-44143</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the great writeup, and I&#039;m glad you&#039;re enjoying Wufoo. I just wanted to let you know that your form that is embedded sees to cut off the submit button a little short. To fix that, just increase the height of the iframe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the great writeup, and I&#8217;m glad you&#8217;re enjoying Wufoo. I just wanted to let you know that your form that is embedded sees to cut off the submit button a little short. To fix that, just increase the height of the iframe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

