<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twittering the whispering revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 21 Jul 2010 04:39:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: mark raheja</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-15020</link>
		<dc:creator>mark raheja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 15:27:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/#comment-15020</guid>
		<description>late to the convo with not much to add, other than that i agree with jay on this one.  when things like twitter surface, i try to ignore the site and think about the behaviour.  there is something compelling about it, but it&#039;s utility grows exponentially when placed in the context of a richer network.  i liked miss rogue&#039;s thoughts on the appeal[s] of Twitter, on horsepigcow.  you know i dig status updates, as they provide an outlet for my seemingly incessant desire to unleash really bad quips/puns unto the world.  will i be making status updates a couple of years from now?  i wonder.  i wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>late to the convo with not much to add, other than that i agree with jay on this one.  when things like twitter surface, i try to ignore the site and think about the behaviour.  there is something compelling about it, but it&#39;s utility grows exponentially when placed in the context of a richer network.  i liked miss rogue&#39;s thoughts on the appeal[s] of Twitter, on horsepigcow.  you know i dig status updates, as they provide an outlet for my seemingly incessant desire to unleash really bad quips/puns unto the world.  will i be making status updates a couple of years from now?  i wonder.  i wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mark raheja</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8684</link>
		<dc:creator>mark raheja</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 15:32:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/#comment-8684</guid>
		<description>late to the convo with not much to add, other than that i agree with jay on this one.  when things like twitter surface, i try to ignore the site and think about the behaviour.  there is something compelling about it, but it&#039;s utility grows exponentially when placed in the context of a richer network.  i liked miss rogue&#039;s thoughts on the appeal[s] of Twitter, on horsepigcow.  you know i dig status updates, as they provide an outlet for my seemingly incessant desire to unleash really bad quips/puns unto the world.  will i be making status updates a couple of years from now?  i wonder.  i wonder.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>late to the convo with not much to add, other than that i agree with jay on this one.  when things like twitter surface, i try to ignore the site and think about the behaviour.  there is something compelling about it, but it&#8217;s utility grows exponentially when placed in the context of a richer network.  i liked miss rogue&#8217;s thoughts on the appeal[s] of Twitter, on horsepigcow.  you know i dig status updates, as they provide an outlet for my seemingly incessant desire to unleash really bad quips/puns unto the world.  will i be making status updates a couple of years from now?  i wonder.  i wonder.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jay Goldman</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jay Goldman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Mar 2007 22:05:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/#comment-8108</guid>
		<description>Tom -

I agree about media as enablers but I&#039;m a little lost when it comes to Twitter. I&#039;m stuck on the feeling that it&#039;s a feature of a much bigger application set, and one that&#039;s not even very well implemented. If Facebook added IM/SMS updates to status, it would achieve the same thing but in a much richer UI filled with more more information. Am I missing something? Help me understand!

- j.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom -</p>
<p>I agree about media as enablers but I&#8217;m a little lost when it comes to Twitter. I&#8217;m stuck on the feeling that it&#8217;s a feature of a much bigger application set, and one that&#8217;s not even very well implemented. If Facebook added IM/SMS updates to status, it would achieve the same thing but in a much richer UI filled with more more information. Am I missing something? Help me understand!</p>
<p>- j.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Remarkk! &#187; &#8220;Ancient Peru Unearthed&#8221; at the ROM: Bloggable!</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/comment-page-1/#comment-8021</link>
		<dc:creator>Remarkk! &#187; &#8220;Ancient Peru Unearthed&#8221; at the ROM: Bloggable!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Mar 2007 03:35:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/2007/03/10/twittering-the-whispering-revolution/#comment-8021</guid>
		<description>[...] Now, if we could just do something about all the flashtastrophe (neologism credit: Radiant Core) websites that the culture sector seems wedded to in search of a hipster figleaf. Rich media is not better media, people! Just look at Twitter. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Now, if we could just do something about all the flashtastrophe (neologism credit: Radiant Core) websites that the culture sector seems wedded to in search of a hipster figleaf. Rich media is not better media, people! Just look at Twitter. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
