<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s all about the content stupid. Is it?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 15:04:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Thomas Purves &#187; The best new music you won&#8217;t hear on the radio</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-27</link>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Purves &#187; The best new music you won&#8217;t hear on the radio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 May 2006 19:16:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-27</guid>
		<description>[...] I wrote earlier about distribution being King when it comes to media. So here is my attempt, quixotic though it may be to try and see what one little blog can try and do to stem the tide against the dreadfulness of mainstream music. Here it is, my compilation of the best damn rockandroll songs of the year so far. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I wrote earlier about distribution being King when it comes to media. So here is my attempt, quixotic though it may be to try and see what one little blog can try and do to stem the tide against the dreadfulness of mainstream music. Here it is, my compilation of the best damn rockandroll songs of the year so far. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:01:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-13</guid>
		<description>These are only the top 12 movies so we really are still only talking about the very short end of the tail. No real art house films you would think are aimed at the top 12.

It was somewhat arbitrary that I used rotten tomatoes, but it&#039;s also interesting measure because a lot of the &quot;better&quot; Arty films don&#039;t score highest in rotton tomatoes because there will generally be debate about them even among critics, not everyone will like them. It takes a relatively more harmless movie that *nobody* dislikes to score a 100 in the tomatoe rating.

it could just be a coincidence that this weekend&#039;s data showed a negative correlation between revenues and reviews. One would hope that a proper study would show more balanced results but who knows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are only the top 12 movies so we really are still only talking about the very short end of the tail. No real art house films you would think are aimed at the top 12.</p>
<p>It was somewhat arbitrary that I used rotten tomatoes, but it&#8217;s also interesting measure because a lot of the &#8220;better&#8221; Arty films don&#8217;t score highest in rotton tomatoes because there will generally be debate about them even among critics, not everyone will like them. It takes a relatively more harmless movie that *nobody* dislikes to score a 100 in the tomatoe rating.</p>
<p>it could just be a coincidence that this weekend&#8217;s data showed a negative correlation between revenues and reviews. One would hope that a proper study would show more balanced results but who knows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-43895</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 02:01:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-43895</guid>
		<description>These are only the top 12 movies so we really are still only talking about the very short end of the tail. No real art house films you would think are aimed at the top 12.

It was somewhat arbitrary that I used rotten tomatoes, but it&#039;s also interesting measure because a lot of the &quot;better&quot; Arty films don&#039;t score highest in rotton tomatoes because there will generally be debate about them even among critics, not everyone will like them. It takes a relatively more harmless movie that *nobody* dislikes to score a 100 in the tomatoe rating.

it could just be a coincidence that this weekend&#039;s data showed a negative correlation between revenues and reviews. One would hope that a proper study would show more balanced results but who knows...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These are only the top 12 movies so we really are still only talking about the very short end of the tail. No real art house films you would think are aimed at the top 12.</p>
<p>It was somewhat arbitrary that I used rotten tomatoes, but it&#8217;s also interesting measure because a lot of the &#8220;better&#8221; Arty films don&#8217;t score highest in rotton tomatoes because there will generally be debate about them even among critics, not everyone will like them. It takes a relatively more harmless movie that *nobody* dislikes to score a 100 in the tomatoe rating.</p>
<p>it could just be a coincidence that this weekend&#8217;s data showed a negative correlation between revenues and reviews. One would hope that a proper study would show more balanced results but who knows&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-12</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:38:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-12</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. Yes well I think there&#039;s still point is that it&#039;s a shame that art doesn&#039;t make better business...

sorry for the comments hassle. I *think* I&#039;ve got it fixed now. [you&#039;re the first person to leave a comment!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. Yes well I think there&#8217;s still point is that it&#8217;s a shame that art doesn&#8217;t make better business&#8230;</p>
<p>sorry for the comments hassle. I *think* I&#8217;ve got it fixed now. [you're the first person to leave a comment!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Administrator</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-43894</link>
		<dc:creator>Administrator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-43894</guid>
		<description>Thanks for your comments. Yes well I think there&#039;s still point is that it&#039;s a shame that art doesn&#039;t make better business...

sorry for the comments hassle. I *think* I&#039;ve got it fixed now. [you&#039;re the first person to leave a comment!]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for your comments. Yes well I think there&#8217;s still point is that it&#8217;s a shame that art doesn&#8217;t make better business&#8230;</p>
<p>sorry for the comments hassle. I *think* I&#8217;ve got it fixed now. [you're the first person to leave a comment!]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nolan.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nolan.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:25:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-10</guid>
		<description>Ah... that&#039;s weird, did my comment make it in?  Are comments also moderated in addition to having to be forced to logged in?  Hmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; that&#8217;s weird, did my comment make it in?  Are comments also moderated in addition to having to be forced to logged in?  Hmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nolan.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-43893</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nolan.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-43893</guid>
		<description>Ah... that&#039;s weird, did my comment make it in?  Are comments also moderated in addition to having to be forced to logged in?  Hmm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah&#8230; that&#8217;s weird, did my comment make it in?  Are comments also moderated in addition to having to be forced to logged in?  Hmm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nolan.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-9</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nolan.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:24:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-9</guid>
		<description>Tom,

I think what many people don&#039;t realize is there are two different factions at work when it comes to mass release movies.  

The business side of things and the art side of things.

A movie that is good business is usually not art, and a movie that is art is usually not good business.

BTW, registering to comment is a real pain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>I think what many people don&#8217;t realize is there are two different factions at work when it comes to mass release movies.  </p>
<p>The business side of things and the art side of things.</p>
<p>A movie that is good business is usually not art, and a movie that is art is usually not good business.</p>
<p>BTW, registering to comment is a real pain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Nolan.ca</title>
		<link>http://www.thomaspurves.com/2006/04/25/its-the-content-stupid-is-it/comment-page-1/#comment-43892</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Nolan.ca</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 01:24:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thomaspurves.com/?p=16#comment-43892</guid>
		<description>Tom,

I think what many people don&#039;t realize is there are two different factions at work when it comes to mass release movies.  

The business side of things and the art side of things.

A movie that is good business is usually not art, and a movie that is art is usually not good business.

BTW, registering to comment is a real pain...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom,</p>
<p>I think what many people don&#8217;t realize is there are two different factions at work when it comes to mass release movies.  </p>
<p>The business side of things and the art side of things.</p>
<p>A movie that is good business is usually not art, and a movie that is art is usually not good business.</p>
<p>BTW, registering to comment is a real pain&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

